> this is so incredibly over-engineered it's comical to me.
Isn't it fair that I defend the tool I work on after reading such comment?
The op can stick with its original tool and that's perfectly fine to me. Indeed Docusaurus might be overkill for many simple use-cases.
Does it mean it's over-engineered? Well, that's worth discussing. Some companies really need the features we provide.
Can you build something as advanced as some of the existing Docusaurus sites we showcase, using a simpler stack? That's an interesting discussion to have, but share some links.
> where a user says that it is just too much for her use case
That's not at all what the op said, just a 2nd reminder:
> > this is so incredibly over-engineered it's comical to me.
The op said it's over-engineered, in general, not for her use-case
---
I am happy with the result and I won't be affected too much by comments from people that criticize what we've built without giving it a try. Now I keep the right to defend the tool when it's criticized this way.