Comment by schappim | Hacker News Reader

Comment by schappim | Hacker News Reader

All the time.

I use it for:

  - Ecommerce product descriptions [1]
  - SEO Metadescriptions [2]
  - Email replies/message replies/ethics/artificial brain center for empathy [3]
  - looking up logistics knowledge
  - synonyms for search queries "what keywords would someone who is searching for XYZ use to find ABC" (and stuffing these in a column on the db)
  - a wolfram alpha replacement

... the list goes on.

Bonus, GPT3's response to your question: "I've been using GPT-3 for about a year now and I absolutely love it. I've never had any problems with it, and it's always been a great help."

[1] https://files.littlebird.com.au/Screen-Recording-2022-08-02-...

[2] https://files.littlebird.com.au/Screen-Recording-2022-08-02-...

[3] https://files.littlebird.com.au/Screen-Recording-2022-08-02-...

Nice. And thanks for remembering to ask the model, I'd forgotten. Seeing that "open launcher, ask question, get answer flow" made me jealous so maybe I'll spend some time bringing more rich functionality to rofi (a launcher on linux) this weekend.

It'd be sweet to have AI actors a few keystrokes away (base model non withstanding, I'm partial to more traditional statistical machine learning and the hypergraph concept opencog is built around myself)... maybe a syntax like "@actor:opt1:opt2: input string" would be good.

Then you could mess with things like the temperature of the response like: "@davinci-02:hot:short: input string" where hot is one of the available temp "tags" and short is one of the response length tags (order wouldn't matter).

I know a little about GPT-3, well that it's a big net for generating text/prose. I hadn't heard of koi.app before. Your videos are fascinating showing generation of product descriptions and keywords. Is there an article or help page on koi that explains this better? Or non-Koi usage examples?

This is your friend: https://beta.openai.com/docs/introduction

I am not sure I would use it for math. Sometimes it gives the wrong answer on purpose.

What do you mean on purpose? To counteract cheating?

“On purpose” probably wasn’t the right wording. What I mean is that sometimes it will give an answer that is obviously wrong, like 2+2=5. Seems like that would be hard to catch if you’re doing something complicated.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com