Hacker News Reader

True but from a practical standpoint they risk a full $500.000 upfront:

“Both investments happen at the same time; they are not contingent on any milestones.”

So from a founder perspective, that’s very friendly.

That is true, but the comment I was replying to was implying that you get 500k at 7%, which is wrong.

If you ever finance again you have to take the note, right?

That’s actually a good question, the language isn’t clear on whether the 325k note is mandatory or not.

What is a "safe"? I have never heard that term in this usage before.

"You are technically correct, the best kind of correct."

But it’s not 500k for 7%, it’s 125k. This makes a massive difference in the implied valuation, it’s not just a technicality.