The title skips all of that for zero nuance and an outright accusation.
edit: Putting in the title as it stands of this comment before it gets ninja edited "Microsoft’s $3M anti-abortion donations under fire from activists, shareholders"
The title skips all of that for zero nuance and an outright accusation.
edit: Putting in the title as it stands of this comment before it gets ninja edited "Microsoft’s $3M anti-abortion donations under fire from activists, shareholders"
https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2022/08/corporate-donations...
As you said it's more that the orgs that are donating to PACs, need to be aware of what the PACs they're donating to are doing with that money, because the actions are happening after the fact. Interestingly in that same article is that Pfizer and Comcast are the biggest donators since 2018, but that isn't called out either.
It looks like quite a mess as an outsider looking in, sorry to be judgmental, but it feels like PACs are taking advantage of orgs that don't want to face retaliatory action from either party. How can this be in the public's interest?