anyone know if it cheaper to make a bridge or tunnel across the thames?
But since this is in the middle of a busy city, I'd guess other factors dominate, costs for land access and approach roads, river traffic, appearances etc.
Honestly, i would just trust the architects and urban planners. At least in my country, every new development i saw recently, even those i was kind of against at first (in 4 different cities) were upgrades once finished. Even when it lost something i really was attached to, i have to admit that this is overall better now.
Tall and short ships and boats travel up and down it.
A bridge would cost a lot to upkeep.