It's complete willful ignorance to mock or dismiss this. It may not be a 'dangerous at any speed' scenario, but that's only a difference of scale because there aren't a lot of Teslas on the road and because FSD is an add-on. If Tesla were allowed to keep releasing such an untested product with such a poor safety track record without repercussions, it could set the tone for other auto manufacturers to do the same. Luckily other auto manufacturers aren't being as reckless.

FSD is dangerously immature software that is not anywhere close to road ready, and yet we are supposed to trust it not to kill or injure people.

Some examples:

- Teslas can't distinguish yellow stoplights from the moon.

https://twitter.com/JordanTeslaTech/status/14184133078625853...

- Numerous examples of near-misses where it decides to veer into pedestrians

- They are demonstrably much more dangerous than other cars:

https://www.tesladeaths.com/resources.html

Aside from the software, they also aren't safe on a mechanical level either, since for instance, they don't have good mechanical safety mechanisms as a fallback for when the electronics fail, and people are trapped in burning cars.

https://www.autoblog.com/2019/02/25/fatal-tesla-model-s-cras...

In my state FSD/Autopilot luckily isn't street legal, but if it was and I saw another Tesla on the road, rather than take my chances I'd pull over if I wasn't able to keep sufficient distance from them. And I certainly wouldn't want to take my chances near them as a pedestrian.

I will give Tesla credit for popularizing EVs and innovating auto design, but that doesn't make up for such poor execution in manufacturing, safety design, and alpha-quality software being trusted to make decisions that can kill people when.