Layman question from not GP, but wouldn't reducing the "overhead" around transistors increase the transistors-per-area metric and thus be at least somewhat useful?
Layman question from not GP, but wouldn't reducing the "overhead" around transistors increase the transistors-per-area metric and thus be at least somewhat useful?
As you shrink the contacts and the metals their resistance and capacitance exponentially increase. This means that both your power will go up and your speeds will go down. Also the process becomes more prone to manufacturing errors. So shrinking those elements blindly without innovation just to increase the density numbers is not really a good metric of the quality of the process.
transistor switches /( s * mm * Joule) ?
Koomey's law seems to hold strong.
I work in Analog so I'd like a more analog based definition (which also works for digital tbh) based on size or density, trans-conductance(gm), output resistance (ro), and Unity frequency (fT) but that's never going to happen :<