It's just not plausible to me that this wasn't an intentional attempt to mislead about some pretty darn fundamental properties of the investment scheme.
It's just not plausible to me that this wasn't an intentional attempt to mislead about some pretty darn fundamental properties of the investment scheme.
It works as follows: When you sign up to enable direct deposit, FTX opens an account for you at Evolve. You can use that account number to have some or all of your paycheck direct-deposited. When you buy cryptocurrencies on FTX, that account is automatically debited. (This avoids the ACH transfer step if you were to purchase using your "regular" bank account.)
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure the deposited funds are FDIC insured, up until you use them for a purchase. But FTX isn't allowed to say that without mentioning the name of the actual bank (Evolve), and the FDIC thinks the "until you use them for a purchase" part of the preceding sentence is confusing.
I agree with the FDIC here, but I don't think FTX's statements were particularly nefarious. There's more nuance here than could fit into the tweet this C&D is about.
Edit to add: this is how FTX explains it when you enable this feature on their site (no mention of FDIC insurance, but if it's a regular checking account, the unspent funds in that account would be protected if either FTX or Evolve went bust): https://pifke.org/ftxdd.png
- if you ACH push/pull funds from your other banks accounts into FTXus, are those funds held in that Evolve Bank checking account (therefore being FDIC insured)?
- if you deposit some crypto/stables and sell to USD, are those funds deposited into the Evolve Bank account?
- if you wire in USD (domestic and international) are those stored in the Evolve Bank?
So technically this is accurate but very misleading. This is a complete nothing burger. They want Brett to remove a tweet (posted on his personal account by the way) and text on 3rd party sites FTX US does not control. Government regulation at its best.
Yes? Your own comment says this was a deliberate attempt to mislead people. This is exactly what regulation is meant to stop.
Either your deposits are federally protected from failure of the institution, or not.
It's as ridiculous as me telling my credit card issuers that their loans to me are federally protected because I have an FDIC bank account.
Nobody's worried about some bank going under, we're worried about the risk of trusting our money with a crypto exchange when so many have been Ponzi schemes.
Waving around the terms FDIC- and SIPC-insured in a way that implies that it means something to the end consumer is, IMHO, the sign of a scammer.
Doing things like this certainly conveys useful information, although not the information they intended to convey.
Fraudulently. Not just cluelessly. The “government can’t crypto” meme led a lot of people to lawlessness.