Why jump to it when simpler explanations exist?
Delays in diagnosis or no diagnosis at all is likely a more fitting explanation.
Delays in diagnosis or no diagnosis at all is likely a more fitting explanation.
I don't really think anyone here has the ability or expertise to judge which is more fitting.
For what it's worth, the fact circulatory issues is mentioned in the article should ring alarm bells for COVID vaccines being a potential cause.
We just found out recently the prevalence of myocarditis among teenage boys that get the vaccine is extremely high compared to what was expected.
Your thought process is classic example of zero risk bias.
So safe they need to avoid liability? So safe many of the vaccines had complication rates far higher than any flu vaccine in history?
Look I'm glad we had the vaccines so quickly. Trump pushing them through regulation was extremely good for man kind and we have all benefited.
But stop acting like there is no risk.
We know some people will be harmed by vaccination. Despite that, we need to vaccinate as many people as possible. Because of that, we make it easy for people who've been harmed to claim compensation from a government and industry backed fund, rather than force those harmed people to go through the courts against multi-billion dollar companies with very expensive lawyers.
Despite thousands of reports of injuries, including death, I don’t think anybody has been compensated.
Can you give more details about that part? IIRC it worked as intended.