It wasn't until vocal music in the early enlightenment essentially happened upon major/minor chords and built modalities around them (largely by accident, because they sound good!) that people went back to the drawing board to build a mathematical description of the scale based on integer ratios instead. And from there, it was a quick jump to the equitempered scale we know today, which (unlike the pythagorean scale) actually is a very good approximation to the "real" chords people were singing.
And the first composer to really put all those new tools together into a coherent theory behind how to compose music was... J. S. Bach. He didn't "invent" all that stuff, but his works were the first ones we can look at and recognize what we now call "modern" exploitations of tuning and tonality. Anyone earlier was missing big pieces. Anyone later was only adding something new here or there.
JSB is a genuine discontinuity, and it's worthwhile to celebrate that.
Not only is it a resounding no, there is ongoing research to find the roots of this cliche.
I can't seem to find the article, but it traces it back to this chemical engineer who did a statistical analysis of the bass lines and cadencial formulae in Bach's chorales.
I've even seen some scans of his analyses, it's wild stuff. Maybe it's on libgen? I can't remember but you can probably do a search for it...
Edit: added a link to the article
Edit2: nope, never mind, that wasn't it. But if I find it I'll add the URL later...
But there is no doubt that he was a pioneer of music theory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_tuning
https://www.jstor.org/stable/24045969 (Pythagoras and the Origin of Music Theory)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2104.00998.pdf (Dynamical systems, celestial mechanics, and music: Pythagoras revisited)