If you have some giant organization where you must implement stuff like this, then fine. If you have a small organization where you don't have to, then meetings should have a facilitator leading the meeting, and then should flow essentially like a conversation.
One alternative I've really liked is Cannon's [0]. It's got all the essential elements and clearly explains how to escape the rules and run meetings largely as conversations.
[0] https://www.amazon.com/Cannons-Concise-Guide-Rules-Order/dp/...
However, we have had situations over the years where it really mattered whether there was quorum, how an emergency meeting could be called, the scope of authority of the executive board, whether phone/write-in/proxy votes counted, etc. Formal procedures often don't matter--but sometimes they do.
In the presence of good faith, formal rules aren't needed.
Much like methane and "thou which smelt it", I get very cynical whenever anyone calls for formalization.
One speaker at time/don't interrupt people.
Decisions are made only after everyone's had the opportunity to discuss/speak
Proposals need to be specific/defined
Majority rule but minority rights.