> And so is any other argument to attempt to explain what was before the universe. Those are outside the realms of science.

That's the point of the submitted article. That any theory that cannot be proven should not be paid much attention to. They are nice thought experiments but that's it.

  > And furthermore, just because something is not falsifiable does not make it untrue.

Neither does it make it true. The point is if there can't be proof then it's pointless to think too much about it.

  > I posted that lecture as an intro to broaden people's perspectives.

Unfortunately the video failed miserably at that. It was full of wrong claims and conclusions, logic errors and on top used the same attacks on certain groups that it in the beginning complained about.

  > It is then a proof by induction to reach the correct religion that explains our world. Some signs are summarized on www.provingislam.com. There are lots of great scholars who have presented many proofs on the matter. 

You said there were proofs in the video. There were none whatsoever. You can't follow a proof of induction based on wrong premises. Religion does not explain our world, science does (to some extend). Religion is a tool that has been used for good and bad throughout history.

Please don't refer to more outside sources that supposedly contain proof but bring one solid proof here yourself. So far everything has been debunked.