Proven you say? So much proof that they continue to be held without even having been charged (never mind tried and convicted on so much supposed clear evidence) for crimes years after their detention.
elementary school level basic rules of justice: If you have evidence, you use it to bring forth charges quickly, otherwise, shut up and release whoever you're holding. The U.S government certainly doesn't lack the resources to just proceed with a trial.
How can his guilt be confirmed if he was never even charged?
You sure about that? I believe US territories are subject to the jurisdiction of the Constitution. Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, is notably not a US territory.
I am sorry, but what kind of substance abuse and education is this?!
Are you allowed to grab your AR15 and shoot foreign tourists? Can you keep them as slaves?
Have you thought about the implications of what you've written for even two seconds?
Nobody would ever travel or do business in a country where they have no rights, you'd have as many foreign PHD students as Somalia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insular_Cases
> The preliminary answer came from a series of Supreme Court rulings, now known as the Insular Cases, which responded to the question of how American constitutional rights apply to those in United States territories. The Supreme Court held that full constitutional protection of rights does not automatically (or ex proprio vigore—i.e., of its own force) extend to all places under American control. This meant that inhabitants of unincorporated territories such as Puerto Rico—"even if they are U.S. citizens"—may lack some constitutional rights (e.g., the right to remain part of the United States in case of de-annexation)[2] because they were not part of the United States.
Never overturned.