> And the users doing the curated need to be vetted.
It comes back to the age-old question: Who vets the vetters?
It comes back to the age-old question: Who vets the vetters?
You can make decent attempts, such as academic peer review. Even this system perpetuates its own problems (beta amyloid) and has perverse incentives (publish or perish, falsified results), though.
Semantic web had some good ideas about this. Networks of signed FOAF data attached to articles and posts. You could form a side graph of trust information that you could revoke at any time.