> It's not a difficult to say, "while we have no policies that restrict lawful content, we reserve the right to not service those who host and promulgate content that explicitly creates emergency threats to human life."

And if everyone did that, its the exact same as government censorship minus any sort of due process or redress ability.

There's this weird idea that government censorship is abhorent but private censorship is somehow without sin, even when the results are basically identical.