> Section 230(c)(2) further provides "Good Samaritan" protection from civil liability for operators of interactive computer services in the good faith removal or moderation of third-party material they deem "obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected."
Nonething in that description pertains to someone's opinion. First amendment allows you to hold nazi beliefs in principle, no matter how someone might perceive them as offensive.
> Nonething in that description pertains to someone's opinion.
Literally all of those items are subjective and a matter of opinion.
>First amendment allows you to hold nazi beliefs in principle, no matter how someone might perceive them as offensive.
The First Amendment prevents Congress from making laws abridging the freedom of speech. Social media platforms and private citizens are not Congress, so they are perfectly within their legal rights to tell Nazis to get the hell off their lawn.
Restrictions to the first amendment have traditionally been on the basis of a narrow set of immediate threats. They are not thought crimes.
Citation needed.