>If regulators instead went after service pricing abuse
How would this work in a manner that isn't vastly more invasive than right to repair bills? I can't think of anything similar.
How would this work in a manner that isn't vastly more invasive than right to repair bills? I can't think of anything similar.
Also, how is this level of regulatory inspection invasive? The architectural tight integration almost guarantees that the device manufacturer has a monopoly on servicing their products—it’s just that the monopoly is being allowed because it’s the kind that allows for innovation. The regulatory crackdown would be fair and justifiable.