> They're doing it too so we should also?

It's the new logic. We may be doing the bad thing, but our worst enemies also do the bad thing, therefore the bad thing is good q.e.d.

It's not about them doing it too; it's acknowledging that the issue is not particular to one place to better understand the complexity of the issue. Most people in the US believe the US is particularly bad when it comes to policing but that is not true. Could we be better? Yes. Are we uniquely bad? No.

Most of those countries listed while they have multiple ethnicities, the police cannot tell one ethnicity from the other, readily, so I don't think it's a big factor (outside Brazil), so yeah, Egypt and Pakistan have ethnicities that hate each other, but the police don't filter for ethnicity and then deliver violence, they are just violent.

Also, police mistreatment is not only killings (which can be sometimes be justified and other times not) but also rights violations and other lesser violence. For example, you are extremely unlikely to be killed by Japanese police (they can bet perps will not have weapons) but once you get arrested, you have very few rights. Other places are rife with bribery and corruption (Mexico, Brazil). In Spain you might get the rubberhose treatment, and anecdotally, I know someone who got a very nice dog sicked on to them by the police in Germany (it looked like you were running away!).

Carrying guns is a lot less common, even among criminals, hence escalation dynamics become easier.

Not really feasible to put the 2. Amendment Pandora’s box back together to get similar logistics in the US I fear.