Hacker News Reader

Comment by makeitdouble | Hacker News Reader

MiniDisc only real flaw was that it was a Sony format. The copy limitations, issues with the record labels, limited third party support, excessive price outside of Japan etc all come from there.

Otherwise outside of sampling rate (MD were ATRAC only at first), the points you raise were not an issue if you bought into the ecosystem: buying music directly in MD, playing it on your portable player and sticking it in your Sony compo would be fine. Buying blank MDs and recording, copying etc. on them was mostly fine, all of that on a format way more sturdier, stable, and convenient than CDs.

I think CDs would have "died" and get replaced with MDs if it wasn't for Sony being themselves and screwing it up.

View on HN

Again, the sound quality is not the same as CD; I don't know why you're ignoring this because it's a show-stopper. Because of this, you have to buy 2 copies of everything: MD and CD. Otherwise, what's the point of having a nice home stereo system if you're going to play shitty-sounding music on it? Sure, in the car or in public you might not notice the difference, but at home on a nice system you will.

We already had a lo-fi format available: cassette. Why bother paying a lot of money to go to another format that also has lousy sound quality when you can just buy a CD?

Shitty sounding? Have you used minidisc? I honestly can’t tell the difference between CD and minidisc. I’ve even got a marantz cd/md combo that rips cds to MDs. I can play the sound sound back to back in both formats on this unit and I can’t hear the difference. This is on my Yamaha NS-200 monitors in my nice sounding room.

Mini disc sounds nothing like cassette but it has a lot of the good features like re-recording and even digital management of the tracks which is better than cassette or cd. I even have an MD head unit in my car!

I record a lot of stuff in mono as I usually don’t care for the stereo most of the time.

Yes it’s way too expensive. But I’ve got 22 year old discs that still work. It’s paying off in the long run for me.

The only issue I have is that it’s getting harder to find the gear

Sound quality was pretty high from the first versions. As you point out, not CD levels, but as a portable player it was good enough in comparison to what we had at the time. From there they improved the compression algos and had a lossless format towards the end.

Why would you buy two copies of everything? You buy a CD and dub the CD onto a blank MD. It'll still sound better than a cassette by a lot. Pre-recorded MDs were a rarity even in Japan. Part of why they were so popular in Japan is they made good quality copies from the CDs you got at rental shops.

>You buy a CD and dub the CD onto a blank MD. It'll still sound better than a cassette by a lot. Pre-recorded MDs were a rarity even in Japan.

Ah, ok, I didn't get this part. Were the blank MDs overpriced?

The minidisc was for many things right for portable music. The audio quality was great, indistinguishable from CD to me, and any minor detail gets washed out when riding on the train or walking on a street. CDs are great but not a portable media. They scratch, break etc. It can be hard to load a new disc when standing it in crowded places. Portable CD players were awful at skipping. The couple seconds buffer was fine for a small bump but that was it. MDs were bulletproof.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com