Samsung wins appeal, Australian Galaxy Tab 10.1 injunction overturned

  It is sufficient for us to express the view that, on the
  present state of the evidence, there is a real and
  substantial prospect that the importation into and supply
  in Australia of the Galaxy Tab 10.1 will not infringe
  claim 6 of the Touch Screen Patent. We have referred to
  a number of difficulties that confront Apple in making good
  its case on infringement. It may well be that, on a final
  hearing, Apple will meet these difficulties. But
  difficulties they are. Whilst we would not be prepared to
  say that Apple's case on infringement is not open to be
  argued, the difficulties to which we have referred do
  affect the assessment at the present time of the probability
  that, if on a final hearing the evidence remains the same,
  Apple will be found to be entitled to final injunctive
  relief for infringement of that claim. If Apple has
  established a prima facie case at all (which we doubt), it
  is founded upon a construction argument which, if the
  evidence remains as it is, is unlikely to succeed at trial.

If Apple considers them their biggest threat, then that's quite an endorsement.

  7. The respondents pay the appellants’ costs of and  
  incidental to the application for leave to appeal and the 
  appeal.