Definitely. If you're not fighting an unpopular war far overseas somewhere it's not really a problem.
What about the locations of nuclear weapons?
Limiting their employees/military from blabbing the secrets is a separate issue.
> What about the locations of nuclear weapons?
Security through obscurity. I'm sure some of the US's adversaries know where at least some nuclear weapons are located, and it seems to have not been a problem so far.
What's everybody so scared of? The US could cut its military by 75% overnight and little would change for the US itself. So-call 'allies' overseas might have to start footing their own bill for defense or attempt to make peace with their neighbors, but for the US nothing changes.
Is it your argument there is no reason ever for the government to censor information?
Now I'm in agreement with you.... but the logical conclusion is basically some form of anarchism.
You mean Montana and North and South Dakota? You can't really hide a silo location from satellites. This was the impetus behind the MX missile program back in the 80's or whenever, it was going to create a huge chain of silos that missiles were constantly shifted around between so the Soviets couldn't know where they were and couldn't target them.