But no, they specifically said most of them are not orbiting red dwarfs:
> Most super-Earths orbit cool dwarf stars, which are lower in mass and live much longer than the sun.
But no, they specifically said most of them are not orbiting red dwarfs:
> Most super-Earths orbit cool dwarf stars, which are lower in mass and live much longer than the sun.
Also apparently the planets will never be brighter than sunset in earth. The author could have at least mention some of the potential problems. I stand by calling this article disingenuous.
The statement, "scientists have found super-Earths orbiting 40 percent of cool dwarfs", specifically links to an article discussing red dwarfs: http://www.inaf.it/en/inaf-news/billions-of-rocky-planets-in... That article quotes the author of an ESO HARPS planetary survey paper: “[o]ur new observations with HARPS mean that about 40% of all red dwarf stars have a super-Earth orbiting in the habitable zone where liquid water can exist on the surface of the planet".
Cool dwarfs seems to be a direct reference to red dwarfs.