> Just because that the messages might be sent end-to-end encrypted from Sue to Joe does not mean Meta cannot read them.
No, that's precisely what End-to-End encryption means.
No, that's precisely what End-to-End encryption means.
Facebook loves to use newspeak, wouldn't surprise me if they applied newspeak to what "end-to-end encryption" means.
Signal might be the only app unable to read, but even that, I would not trust.
The quandary of what one allows to run on those implants sounds like a chilling sci-fi novel (chilling not because "but FAANG could read your thoughts!" but because people would absolutely still get them installed).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End-to-end_encryption#Endpoint...
It's illustrated in their example below that they if you say you're having a baby, meta can send some type of distilled ad-keywords to its servers (eg `[mother, baby]` if it knows the user is a woman based on their name/profile, but probably more sophisticated than that). The message you sent is still technically end-to-end encrypted, though,