Hacker News Reader

Comment by Spooky23 | Hacker News Reader

Pick your talking point. It’s either “sleepy Brandon” if the administration does nothing or some craven scheme to win elections if something is done.

Maybe they’re just doing their job? Seems to me that every time the heat gets turned up on the former guy’s criminality or more is learned about the attempted insurrection/coup, nutty orgs like the WSJ Editorial Board roll out some nonsense.

View on HN

It’s not either, it’s both. Brandon is not in charge. Take for example the statements he made in 60mins about sending US troops to Taiwan & the pandemic ending, both of these are walked back by “the whitehouse” (handlers). Brandon is not even allowed to talk to the press outside of carefully controlled, scripted scenarios and even those he screws up.

They’re desperate to maintain power across all branches of government and this being an obvious political move to taper gas prices, as that was hurting polling stats. That’s the only thing that prompts action.

> Take for example the statements he made in 60mins about sending US troops to Taiwan & the pandemic ending, both of these are walked back by “the whitehouse” (handlers). Brandon is not even allowed to talk to the press outside of carefully controlled, scripted scenarios and even those he screws up.

Or maybe that's all planned because the Taiwanese people need to hear we'll definitively support them while we maintain our official ambiguous position. Point is you don't really know. Are you there in the White House?

It's hard to take you seriously on this topic when you don't seem to recognize a deliberate, consistent, implementation of strategic ambiguity.

"They"

Seek help.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com