I haven't watched the full video yet, but some interesting observations so far:

- 7m 20s: Context on metric used (note that Feller was confirmed cheating): https://i.imgur.com/jgaCLc4.png

- 12m 20s. (paraphrasing) A clinically perfect game (by Carlsen) is still only 79%

- 17m 10s Naka's 2 best games to analyse on chessbase

- 20m Naka says Hans's analysis of one game (not against Carlsen) was "ridiculous"

- 24m 30s "once you see (a good move) you can't unsee it ... but until you see it, it's not obvious at all"

- 27m 30s - "Fischer had 0 games at 100% in his entire career"