Hacker News Reader

Comment by b3morales | Hacker News Reader

Sounds like you have a flourishing Anti-library: https://www.themarginalian.org/2015/03/24/umberto-eco-antili...

> Read books are far less valuable than unread ones. The library should contain as much of what you do not know as your financial means, mortgage rates, and the currently tight real-estate market allows you to put there.

View on HN

> Read books are far less valuable than unread ones.

izzit me or is that total garbage? The only information of value is that which you can use, if it's in a book you've never read it's effectively nonexistent. I get text books to stuff them into my cranium, not have them sit around as handy doorstops.

Might as well leave them in the bookshop until you need them. They're just as unread and you have cash in your pocket for other things you actually need.

The information is more useful once read, but once you know it you don't need the book any more

Unless you anticipate wanting to check and re-check the contents. On a shelf right beside me (as opposed to the plethora of shelves in the room we call "The Library") is a copy of "Concrete Mathematics" by Graham/Knuth/Patashnik, because I am occasionally going through it again. Quite happy I have not decided to let it go.

Sorry for being dense, but I couldn’t deduce from the source; does the “anti” just mean “unread”?

Yeah. It comes off as a playful/tentative term, not a precise one. If a "library" is a collection of read books, an "anti-library" is a collection of unread books.

Most of the books in libraries are books most people haven't read, does that make every library an anti-library?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com