Ad hominem attacks then, rather than any actual rebuttal. What I'm hearing is "Alex De Vries is mean about Bitcoin so you shouldn't listen to him". Someone working for a central bank to me is someone who might know a thing or two about finance, rather than an enemy, but hey...
The thing is, I don't need to listen to him - there's tons of info out there about Bitcoin's presence in Kazakhstan from all sorts of sources. For instance here in New Scientist:
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2284222-coal-powered-bi...
Reuters reporting on energy problems in Kazakhstan due to mining there -
https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/crypto-boom-strains-...
About 20% of BTC hashrate seems to be there, and the energy there is 90% coal and gas. Then we have things like fossil fuel plants being brought out of retirement for Bitcoin mining in the US - https://www.voanews.com/a/bitcoin-mining-power-plant/6273552...
Yes, I know that stopping methane escapes is definitely a good thing. There's no indication that this is happening on any scale, and the stories all talk about "enormous potential", and possibilities and projections. I hope it does become carbon neutral, that would be one less problem with it, but it's not there yet and handwaving away problems because you have a potential solution is disingenuous.