All software with any amount of complexity has bugs, even if there’s a published spec ratified by comittee over the course of 20 years, or whatever your unattainable standard of quality is.
Zig is free software and a community in the best sense of both.
Show some respect.
And I do obviously know who I was interacting with; Kelley's arrogance and lies are legendary (second only to the V devs, but he appears to be consciously competing with them). It drove me away from the language when my own filed bug on this issue was met with a similar response.
> Zig has known bugs and even some miscompilations.
> Zig is immature. Even with Zig 0.9.0, working on a non-trivial project using Zig will likely require participating in the development process.
I don't know why you have it out for me. But as long as your HN account isn't blocked by mods for trolling I'm stuck endlessly refuting your claims.
If you have a language or project as complex as Zig and can provide Andrew with some sort of guidance on better implementation / OSS issue management, I would love to see this. Otherwise, I would encourage you to not post comments criticizing work which you're not qualified to criticize.