You shouldn't be able to profit off of others misery like that, get caught out, and then go whoopsy and pay a small percentage of all the money you made off of it. That just encourages you and others to do it again.
You shouldn't be able to profit off of others misery like that, get caught out, and then go whoopsy and pay a small percentage of all the money you made off of it. That just encourages you and others to do it again.
The same for the people giving him money. They don't care what he says, they never believed Sandy Hook was real for starters. They give him money because they want to see it "uncovered" and investigated from the only "journalist" that takes it
<https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/defamation>
Belief is not an element of the definition.
You're right - it is OK as long as he's not profiting nor has a bullhorn the size of his. Otherwise, Wolfgang Halbig would be in the same kind of shit. He isn't.
But anyway, it's not a very good question because it isn't plausibly serious nor logically related to the previous post.
<https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Just_asking_questions>
See the first seven items under HN guidelines for "In Comments":