Tuna use sharks as back scratchers despite risk of being eaten
newscientist.com
newscientist.com
The sharks are probably not bothered about being used for grooming because it is reassuring to have your lunch check in and say hi occasionally.
6,000 camera deployments of two to three hours each. 117,000 individuals seen from 261 species. 106 rubbing behaviour samples spotted. The article doesn't quite get the rest of the stats sorted out, giving two percentages. Let's say there were roughly 50 tuna on shark rubbing sessions.
Some tuna are nails and probably impressing the girly tuna!
Younger or weak specimens could be, but yellowfin tuna presumably also occasionally chow down on significantly smaller sharks.
I was doing a broad reach at full belt, bouncing over wave peaks, spray everywhere. That beach is very shallow - 1.5m (5') for about 1/2 mile or more and it is also basically quite flat. That means that waves are quite stable when you get there.
I came in from around 2 miles out. I'm hooked in, poised over the water about 18" from my bum doing around 20 knots. I'm perfectly balancing a shit load of forces and feeling absolutely invincible. I then see a dorsal fin rise up out of the water behind me and I came close to voiding my bowels. The Med doesn't have many sharks but there are some. Great whites turn up from time to time.
It was a porpoise.
I ran for around a mile with several porpoises bouncing around in my wake. I would twitch my board and they responded and pissed about in my tiny wake. They would probably prefer a bigger wake to play in but I was the best offer at the time.
I subscribe to New Scientist (actually Dad is currently) and have done so for roughly 35 years. This is not the finest science ever reported.
There will actually be loads of really great science and stuff from these studies but sadly "tuna shags shark" or some other rubbish sells ads n that.
I'm starting to get a bit disillusioned now and might have to pen an "angry of Andover" piece to NS. I'll threaten to cease my subscription (that my dad pays for) and look like a right old prat.
On the other hand, I might simply ask for some decent science. This isn't the best. It sounds novel to start with but rapidly looks like tosh.
And how many more years it will take before tunas can grow fingernails and scratch their own parasites off?
I'd venture that evolution isn't involved at all and it is simply opportunism that was observed. It's such a rare event that we can't science this one much.
Before you grow fingernails, you need to grow fingers. Before you grow fingers, you need something to wave them around on otherwise they don't do much - that'll be arms (or legs). Fish have been there, seen it, done it (multiple times) and reverted too (multiple times).
I would not be surprised if they can think and learn by observation. Then there would be no need for evolution.