I'm going to go ahead and say that probably they are misrepresenting what is happening.
This is clearly a South African based company. GDPR and cookie may be important compliance but it's not top of the totem pole - the local South African equivalent law (POPI) is more about data processing than cookies. Plenty of sites have not updated their cookie UX for the newer regulations.
I've even noticed some sites serve different forms of cookie consent depending on where you're accessing from. I only started seeing the ability to reject cookies entirely when I travelled to EU recently - before it was always hidden in dark pattern UX.
The GDPR is exactly the same. Even the ePrivacy Directive (the so-called "cookie law") actually covers more than just cookies - any method of storage in a user's terminal (whether browser local storage, or an app's own database) is also in scope.
You don't need to ask permission to store a shopping cart or anything like that as a cookie.
The typical practice seems to be to set a session-cookie unconditionally, to be able to store user-related data within that session, even if the user has not provided any such information.
If not then that's fine.
If you do any tracking and you don't use cookies, you still need permission and if you use cookies but you aren't using them for data mining then you do not need to ask for permission.
> Voys Telecom SA (Pty) Ltd A company with limited liability duly incorporated in terms of the Companies Act of South Africa, 71 of 2008, with registration number: 2013/114285/07, hereinafter referred to as “the Service Provider”;
As far as I can tell though each different country office operates largely independently, almost as a franchise. So it might still be that the South African branch, with a registered local entity and no EU-based customers is more focused on POPI than the GDPR.