Well, at which extent this applies to our current case ?
Or is it just a way to look smart, by just citing a famous reference without contextualising to our current issue ?
first the guy claims he is a scientist and continue with some obfuscated babbling mixing emotional tone and hazardous outcome. Which at first and second read, isnt a scientific neutral analysis and critics.
Therefore it left only the "trust me bro" posture. Which is far from beeing efficient at all.
Just because you’re unfamiliar with molecular biology doesn’t make it obfuscated babbling.