Right. I speculate the employer is coercing, in this case. The words were not clearly an opinion.

The complaint:

> "interfering with, restraining, and coercing employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed” in the National Labor Relations Act

The law:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/29/158

My take:

The fact the CEO said that bad things MAY come if employees joined a Union, suggests to me "bad things" is the planned action by Amazon.

References:

- Best practices for EMPLOYERS (See "T" for Threats): https://agworkforce.cals.cornell.edu/2019/10/23/what-employe...

>The Amazon Labor Union, which filed an unfair-labor-practice charge with the NLRB over Jassy’s comments

Hm, it seems nothing has been debated so we don't know if and what's wrong specifically.

In another article:

>To resolve the complaint, Amazon can settle with the union or take the case before an administrative law judge in February.

If only an automation existed to smooth over the bureaucracy.

Amazon CEO is shipping sound bites that make him sound like a victim. Poor aristocrat; he’ll have to wave his wrist and get the workers to automate the task.