Hacker News Reader

Comment by mrkramer | Hacker News Reader

>Based on the analysis of the publicly available information, it appears reasonable to conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic was, more likely than not, the result of a research-related incident.

I knew it from the day 1; my layman understanding was that Covid variants in nature are not that virulent as Covid-19. Covid-19 was GOF experiment which went wrong in a sense that it lab leaked. Lab leaks happen all the time but not as impactful as this one. We should learn from our mistakes not sweep them under the carpet.

View on HN

>We should learn from our mistakes not sweep them under the carpet.

My understanding is that at the start of COVID19 scientists in related fields immediately assumed that a lab leak was the likely cause, and were dumbfounded to hear such a strong and immediate consensus (the Nature letter, for example) against such.

> Lab leaks happen all the time

Honestly, that's terrifying to read. Do you have references to numbers of leaks or other information on the subject?

There you go: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_laboratory_biosecurity...

You can also search previous Covid related discussions here on HN for more information.

Interesting that the 1989 Reston, VA release was not included...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hot_Zone

Page says: "The list is grouped by the year in which the accident or incident occurred and does not include every reported laboratory-acquired infection. This is a dynamic list and may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by adding missing items with reliable sources."

Wikipedia is crowd-sourced project, anyone can edit it if he or she thinks it is necessary(either something might be missing or something might be wrong).

Also useful to look at a list of known LAIs (Lab-acquired infections): https://my.absa.org/LAI

Most of these don't spread beyond the initially infected lab workers, but the sheer number is staggering.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com