Android is available in North America and Apple has no control over it whatsoever.
Apple delivers to Google some double digit percentage of search revenue ... Apple has a LOT of control over it. Not 100% perhaps, but a lot. I realise this comes from a different business line, but between the same 2 companies ... Apple can make Google lose A LOT of money if they wanted to.
Apple also gets billions of dollars for that search traffic from Google (they're not doing it as a nice favor), and they're already working on their own search engine. The argument that Apple has any control over Google because of search traffic hardly holds water at this point.
This is true but super-apps are bad. In this case Apple's monopoly is blocking another monopoly from emerging.
Apple charges a high rent, but would lowering that rent somehow make an app a "super-app"?