"Of course, one might say, but how inefficient or ineffective are all these meetings, e-mails, notifications on Slack, etc., I just want to code or get my brilliant ideas accepted without further discussion. And we all agree there are better or worse ways to get things done at the organizational level (that's an important point), and some companies work better than others and some stages of company life are more conducive to good work and good results"
There are better and worse ways of doing things in a company, but what hunter-gatherers bands were doing is no consequence.
Where we do not agree if when you say that, in this context, starting with anthropology makes sense. And I think it makes zero sense, since the goals, structure and size of hunter-gatherers bands and large work organizations are not even remotely comparable.
Articles of this type are meaningless, they try to be thought-provoking, but they are just trying to impress the gullible. "I never thought about that", yes, because it does not make any sense, not because you are a fool.
A sports team, e.g., soccer team, is comparable in size and goals (win/not lose, die/not die, reproduce/not reproduce, it is clear what is good and what is bad) to a hunter-gatherer band, but what kind of lessons should a coach draw from an anthropological study of hunter-gatherer bands? Nothing, zero, other than some feel-good stories about being a team and not just a collection of individuals, supporting the weak and the elderly.
I have no clue how the editor thought it was an article worth publishing.