Ones who aren't being actively censored by the EU that is.
Show me a mainstream media based in the EU actively supporting Russia in the Ukraine conflict then.
Ones who aren't being actively censored by the EU that is.
Show me a mainstream media based in the EU actively supporting Russia in the Ukraine conflict then.
It's "Russian invasion of Ukraine", not "Ukraine conflict", first.
What point do you want to make with this though? I don't need to find a contrarian to every point to prove anything, that's also just being a contrarian and usually mainstream media avoids being a contrarian. If you live in Fox News-world that might seem alien but MSM is not in the job of being a contrarian.
Burdening me to prove my point by forcing me into an impossible situation won't change much, I could also tell you that support for Ukraine is so unanimous that no MSM in the EU holds the contrarian position you want them to. That's not wrong or the EU silencing it, it's simply a position that almost no business in the EU would dare to hold because they'd suffer a massive hit from public opinion, most EU citizens do not support Russia (as it should be), why should a MSM vehicle take the contrarian point of view?
Show me proof for your statements, please, I can't prove you a negative, I believe you should be quite well aware of that.
Yes, approximately all the time. For a time in England, you couldn’t open a newspaper without finding an article critical of - sometimes imaginary - EU policies.
You will be hard pressed to find an article supportive of Russia outside RT but you can find plenty questioning the timing and amount of weapons given, how we track where the money we give go and especially the idea of allowing Ukraine into the EU.
I think that media very often call out bullshit takes of the government, EU or national. But being against russia just isn't a bullshit take. That said, Media do cover also when Ukraine does things wrong, but those things are just not as common. You can't report 50/50% when the situation is 99/1%.
How do you even support the attacker in this war and remain true to the facts is beyond me. So it's really difficult to understand what do you even mean.
Not every view point is equally valid.