is that just me?
is that just me?
"Here are some #MastoTips" https://mathstodon.xyz/tags/mastotips
T-t-thanks
No, that makes it sound just about right.
This is really stretching it.
> A. Also, my husband blogs twice a day.
> B. Eeww, Yuck!
(Joke being that, for people not knowing what "blogging" is, but who want to appear worldly, it's safe to presume it's something really gross)
Gimp is the worst offender amongst badly named products. Its name is both a kink sex term and a slur against disabled people.
"Toots" are in the same category as "Cockroach" DB. Not something you want to think about. From among similar feature offerings, I'd go for the one that wasn't horribly branded.
Calling them "farts" might be accurate but seems strictly unflattering.
The third use I hadn't heard about until you mentioned it.
Part of the solution though is to just pronounce it "jimp" which is the official way anyhow
(but seriously there are very very few things that "The Gimp" is good for these days when you have the option to use Krita)
however, remember how many people used to so confidently say things like, “i will never use the word tweet. i’m an adult with an adult voice!”
if Mastodon catches on, it’ll just naturally fall into vernacular just like tweet did.
It hasn't even used that name anymore for a while already.
is “tweet” copyrighted?
[as far as I know] hashtags were originally just a twitter thing and they spread outwards. obviously the word “tweet” is more interlinked with twitter’s name and identity, but, if it’s not copyrighted, I don’t see why it shouldn’t be able to spread like hashtags did
https://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4806:hi...
(It seems Twitter actually has the "tweet"® trademark in two different classes, so I'm not sure which one you were originally linking too)
https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=85116717&caseType=SERIAL_...
https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=77715815&caseType=SERIAL_...