Hacker News Reader

Paid software support and seems to be the way to go, but I don't think this really works for this project.

How do GNU and LLVM maintain linkers while staying financially solvent without going proprietary? Why won't the same strategy work in this case?

Companies pay employees to work on them.

If you know of a company who could support Rui, then please let him know.

He was working for Google but he left recently, no? I doubt Google would have any problem if he works on mold linker full time.

I believe he decided to do things this way.. one man show is always problematic (atleast it is easy to go back to lld if anything happens to the author or the project itself)

He doesn't want to work on mold as part of Google or another large company like that because then Google would take ownership of the whole program; he wants to maintain ownership of it. It's mentioned in a tweet of his

Doesn't Google pay people to work on the Linux kernel, even though Google can't take ownership of the whole Linux kernel?

Google owns employee code outside of work if I understand things correctly.

So Google only has copyright over the portions their employees have contributed.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com