Cheeky of him to use -2022 in the exponent reflecting the year of publication
> It is possible to replace the exponent −2022 in Theorem 1 by a larger (negative) value if the current arguments are modified, but we will not discuss it in this paper.
> It is possible to replace the exponent −2022 in Theorem 1 by a larger (negative) value if the current arguments are modified, but we will not discuss it in this paper.
No comments yet.