I'm not talking about "more social services"; I'm talking about UBI, which would absolutely remove most of the incentive to participate in such things.
I realize I forgot to actually put that in the GP, though. Sorry about the lack of clarity.
I realize I forgot to actually put that in the GP, though. Sorry about the lack of clarity.
Using UBI as an argument to eliminate theft crime is like paying terrorists, it doesn't work in the long run; you only end up funding a future, more effective terrorist or criminal who will demand more and more.
Citation required.
Show evidence a population exists, anything close to as large as you're intimating ("lower class" as you called it), that actually wants a "low barely livable wage"?