But if you feel there’s no difference between stocks (an enforceable legal claim on the real property and intellectual property of an on going enterprise), housing (real property) and crypto (nothing, literally nothing) then there’s no point in discussing it.
Crypto is cauterised. There were inklings of institutionalisation, but the Fed raised rates before that took hold. This means the people and wealth in crypto can vanish without compromising much else, a statement I cannot make about most industries or assets.
I would also venture that most people suggesting we not backstop crypto were also opposed to bailing out banks. But unlike with banks or housing, there is no broader interest in crypto.
Which means, errors get caught before compounding too much. It also means knowing that no decision is made with the greater good or lining my pockets mantra solely. It is a combination of both.