Dividing the world into two groups, the upper and under, seems to be more about politics and power, and through that lens, many “rich” people are still in the “underclass” as well.
Dividing the world into two groups, the upper and under, seems to be more about politics and power, and through that lens, many “rich” people are still in the “underclass” as well.
Politically, it has been very useful to convince underclass voters that they are middle or even, often, upper class, and get them voting against measures that would benefit the underclass including themselves. Trump supporters helped institute policies that massively benefit the actual upper class, at their own expense.
[0]: https://www.census.gov/library/visualizations/2015/demo/dist...
[1]: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0d/Distribu...
[2]: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/wp-content/uploads...
In San Francisco, 100k qualifies you for governmental support services like low income housing.
Because with a population of 800k, San Francisco makes up 0.25% of the 332 million people in the US.
I am sure there are additional areas where people making 100k are not middle class.
I am also sure that there are many more areas where this is not the case.