[0] https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-05-03-mn-439-st...
[0] https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-05-03-mn-439-st...
Goats are inherently social, and so a lone goat will find a new group to interact with. What you end up with is a single, ultra-traumatized goat repeatedly finding a group of friends who all get murdered by a flying machine. I suppose it's worth it because otherwise the whole island ecosystem collapses?
There was a wonderful radiolab episode about this in the galapagos[0]
Problem is people often don't like or know how to live with proper apex predators so they get killed off and we have to artificially control animal numbers.
However, in many places, we have introduced non-native species that never had natural predators. Then what?
I assume you're referring to humans.
Hunting goats to local extinction is the cleanest and most humane way to deal with them.
Principal Skinner: Well, I was wrong. The lizards are a godsend.
Lisa: But isn't that a bit short-sighted? What happens when we're overrun by lizards?
Principal Skinner: No problem. We simply unleash wave after wave of Chinese needle snakes. They'll wipe out the lizards.
Lisa: But aren't the snakes even worse?
Principal Skinner: Yes, but we're prepared for that. We've lined up a fabulous type of gorilla that thrives on snake meat.
Lisa: Then we're stuck with gorillas!
Principal Skinner: No, that's the beautiful part. When wintertime rolls around, the gorillas simply freeze to death.
Lisa: Hmm.
EDIT: Yes, I understand you are referring to keeping predators around, and not necessarily introducing new predators. But this is still what jumped in to my mind.
For some reason I found this hilarious and tragic at the same time.