Reporters helped SBF build a credible profile in order for him to steal money, everything to do with reporters writing glowing reviews of SBF and his fraudulent business in exchange for kickbacks of all sorts, including direct grands to several news outlets, which makes reporters corrupt.
The most reputable spokesman the crypto space has managed to cough up was a fraud and a thief. Maybe has something to say about crypto.
how is he most reputable? because he paid a lot for ads?
I would say because of the dozens of articles with "journalists" waxing poetically about his reputation as a big-thinking successfully-entrepreneurial self-made financial-wizard philanthropist. A regular Jeffrey Epstein.
Is there someone else you think fits better? Anyone else in Washington talking about regulation with politicians?