Harvard paper to central banks: Buy Bitcoin
politico.com
politico.com
https://sites.google.com/view/matthewferranti/research
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HBbv5GWIOzzhHdmqAW2MNKHzfFm...
In principle, I can understand Bitcoin's appeal as a reserve asset to central banks, especially those seeking to reduce their reliance on currencies issued by the central banks of other countries. Like gold, which historically has been used as a reserve asset, Bitcoin does not depend on the "full faith and credit" of any government. It depends only a distributed network executing a consensus algorithm.
If for example Japan wants to buy stuff from America, they'll need dollars, so they buy dollars with yen on currency as markets, why would anybody first want to buy a volatile crypto to, after which they still would need to buy dollars to actually purchase the American goods? Or should we replace all national currencies with bitcoin or something? What are you proposing? This has been the recurring problem with cryptofanatics, you understand nothing of basic aconomics and just spout this kind of nonsense which after a first uninformed look seems vaguely credible and you start convincing yourself that crypto's have any real use
After FTX “lobbying” officials comes to light, crypto is going to turn onto a political third rail. Expect regulation and outright bans if its detrimental to Russia/Iran/China.