I can't find it now, but someone in another post on Twitter pointed out that these comparisons aren't very meaningful: Twitter's social topology is any-any between users. A major (and unique) aspect of Twitter is that everybody on Twitter can talk to just about anybody else, and is encouraged to. This is also a critical value proposition for advertising on Twitter, and probably explains the size of their ads team.
This is very different from WhatsApp's topology, which is a relatively traditional chat system (small groups of shared state). Instagram's is closer, but still favors smaller social groups over a global feed.
Beyond that, Twitter is well known for running its own DCs, etc. It doesn't seem inconceivable that all of this, plus internationalization, mature platforms teams, etc. all adds up to four figures.