It Only Takes One Parent to Get All Graphic Novels Removed from School Library
vice.com
vice.com
This bending over backwards trying to offend nobody, not even the impossible-to-please screaming crazy people, is utterly alien to me.
This isn't "bending over backwards". It is simply wrong to have that material there. This kind of material is damaging to children and should not be freely available in the public school library system.
Here's a sample page from Amazon's preview: https://i.imgur.com/dFHyQ4d.png
I don't think even at the height of puberty could I have managed to masturbate to that, even assuming it actually contained drawings meant to arouse. The word graphic doesn't always imply sexually explicit. In "graphic novel" it merely means "drawn".
> This kind of material is damaging to children
Citation needed. The sight of naked humans being damaging to children may just be an invention by America's Bible Belt. In other words damaged adults projecting and being made uncomfortable themselves by proxy, not realizing their children are not yet damaged the same way they are.
Making the human body taboo is how you raise another generation who apparently gets uncontrollably aroused by the mere sight of some skin and thus is made uncomfortable by it. I believe intellectually everyone knows this isn't the natural state of things, but rather something instilled by culture and upbringing?
Others, both within and without the US, seem to be doing fine raising their children sans this thinking. One may even argue other approaches yield more competent adults.
I skimmed (very quickly) through it. The "graphic depictions" of naked people are very tame. It seems reasonable for teenagers to read this.
There's a picture of a boy's drawing of a naked woman, in thick pen.
There's a scene where two adolescents are shirtless and close in bed.
There's a picture of penises, but they boys are ~8 years old or so. It's a bad memory from childhood.
There is room for discussion.
That seems like an awful lot of them. I doubt if my school library even had 3000 books at all, let along graphic novels.
If it's similar to how this works in England (a friend is a teacher), an area that runs public schools -- in England a county -- owns all the books. Schools can borrow e.g. 30 copies of MacBeth one year, and 30 copies of Hamlet the next year, if the teacher doesn't feel like teaching the same thing every year.
They can also borrow 250 different books for 12 year olds, 250 for 13 year olds, etc, to put in the school library. These are gradually rotated between all the schools in the district.
Often districts will rotate books between schools.
The head of the school board chided her for reading the material while a child was in the room.
These types would “remove” people as they remove books if the could. Keep history in mind. “The other” is a powerful and commonly used boogeyman which should be fought. There’s also
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/martin-nie...
Doesn’t matter where on the political or social spectrum one sits, monocultures aren’t good or healthy.