Hacker News Reader

Comment by donatj | Hacker News Reader

I misread Tumblr as Twitter at first and thought that was really interesting. Be really neat to make Twitter a one stop shop.

View on HN

That would be a smart and strategic move for twitter if they did. Along the lines of an embrace, extend, extinguish move against the fediverse.

I have a feeling that would just make most of the server owners ban it

Twitter apparently was working on their own protocol, under a project named BlueSky. I personally feel this was unnecessary and redundant because w3c had put forward activity pub.

However, this project existed just the same. As far as I can tell, the Twitter and blog for the project have not been active since late October and I'm not sure if there's any life to it anymore.

https://blueskyweb.xyz/blog

Here's a contributor's (pfraze) reason for not using ActivityPub.

https://github.com/bluesky-social/atproto/issues/255#issueco...

> a preference for domain usernames over AP’s double-@ email usernames

This I strongly agree.

Frontends can just support both. In Mastodon, I can search for either `@username@example.com` or `https://example.com/@username` and both will suffice to show the same result.

I prefer the email format, like username@example.com

Double @ just look so ugly.

The problem with that format is that it had better also work as an email address, because otherwise people will be extremely confused by it.

> better also work as an email address

Sure why not? Make ActivityPub work over SMTP doesn't sounds like a bad idea.

That would imply that's an email, when in fact it's just a fedi account. It's there for a reason, another one (besides accessibility) is to make it easier parsing for other instances.

Bluesky is very active, we started beta testing 6 days ago https://twitter.com/arcalinea/status/1593439410699501570?s=4...

I though Bluesky was Jack's pet project and unrelated to Twitter Inc.

It was funded by Twitter, but under a separate organization.

BlueSky is completely different from AP.

BlueSky is closer to decentralized SNS, where as AP is actively seeking to become a federated SNS. BlueSky uses DID and independent data repositories, which allows freely migrating b/w instances. AP simply does federation b/w rather classical blog hosting apps.

AP is ActivityPub, the protocol behind Mastodon. But what is SNS? What is DID?

SNS is the usual Social Network Service.

DID is Decentralized IDentifier. It's a design for decentralized identity registries, independent of central ID providers and authorities. Anyone can verify identity without going through the issuer. This is generally considered as a blockchain tech, though the spec is written in a generic way.

I'm sure some senior decision makers at Tumblr also have this in the backs of their minds just in case this move works out well.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com