Certainly, they are more reputable. But I think that a healthy level of skepticism is good and not flat out believing anything from reputable sources is to be expected.
In the US, the New York Times has perhaps the best reputation but they distributed false stories leading up to and during the Iraq war.
I don’t like this idea of “good” sources and “bad” sources and don’t think people should promote trusting sources that are deemed “good.”
Herman and Chomsky write about this in the 80s [0] and I think it’s still valid today. I don’t think we should promote narratives of dualistic struggles, especially if we are presented as being on the righteous side.